Fed’s conundrum

How many hikes would it actually take to control inflation (if that’s the intention) and what would it cost? The Fed meets September 15–16, and for the first time in years, markets are pricing in real odds of a hike rather than a cut. Fed funds futures have this above 70%. Core PCE inflation is running around 3.3%, still above target, and Chair Kevin Warsh has signaled he's not satisfied with "good enough." So, if the Fed decided hiking was the priority, how many would it take? There's no fixed number, but the historical pattern is instructive. Fed tightening cycles that actually broke inflation (Volcker in the early '80s, 2022–23 post-COVID) typically involved either very large moves or sustained series of hikes, not one or two. Given rates are already at 3.5–3.75%, not deeply accommodative, the math may different this time (costly words). Some economists think one or two 25bp moves, held for a while, would probably do more signaling than actual demand destruction. Getting inflation convincingly back to 2% without more labor market damage would likely take a longer hold at a moderately higher rate rather than a rapid series of hikes. But even that approach has consequences: (1) The midterm wrinkle. With elections in November, any hiking cycle collides with the politics of Fed independence almost immediately. A hike (or even a hold accompanied by hawkish language) becomes fodder either way: "the Fed is protecting your purchasing power" versus "the Fed is squeezing growth right before voters go to the polls." Historically the Fed tries to insulate itself from that optics problem by leaning entirely on the data, but it rarely escapes the framing. And (2) the recession question. This is the real tension. The labor market is already showing cracks, July payrolls actually fell, and underlying job growth trends are weaker than the headline numbers suggest. Hiking into a softening labor market, even modestly, raises real recession odds given the usual 12–18 month lag before rate moves fully hit the economy. It wouldn't take many hikes to tip a already-cooling economy into contraction, that's the classic policy-error risk the doves on the committee (the dissents in July all pushed the other way, for what it's worth) are worried about. Perhaps the question is not "how many hikes" are needed, but "how much cooling can the labor market absorb". Warsh and the task forces he has created will likely exploit the hawkish comments before taking any real action, but were one week away from knowing for a fact.

Want to know more? You can register for free at Fund@mental.

#iamfundamental #soyfundamental #wealthmanagement #familyoffice #financialadvisor #financialplanning #policymistake #ratecut #stagflation